FLAGS OF CONVENIENCE REGULATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS FUTURE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE

FLAGS OF CONVENIENCE REGULATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS FUTURE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Publicado 2015-06-09

Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP
Número
Núm. 11: Revista Republicana
Sección
Artículos
Cómo citar
Becerra Rodríguez, R. (2015). FLAGS OF CONVENIENCE REGULATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS FUTURE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE. Revista Republicana, 11. https://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/68
doi
Dimensions
PlumX
Licencia
 
Ronald Becerra Rodríguez
Universidad Libre de Colombia. Internacional London MetropolitanUniversity (Reino Unido)
    Mostrar biografía de los autores

    Ronald Becerra Rodríguez,

    Abogado Universidad Libre de Colombia. Master of Laws LL.M Mención de Mérito Derecho Comercial Internacional London MetropolitanUniversity (Reino Unido). Docente investigador de la Corporación Universitaria Republicana. Investigador inscrito en Colciencias. Miembro del Grupo de Derecho económico y Estado. Línea de Derecho Comercial y Financiero. Categorizado en Colciencias. República de Colombia. Correo electrónico: ronald.becerrar@gmail.com
    Este artículo comprende un estudio relevante de la jurisprudencia y legislación sobre Banderas de Conveniencia dentro de la Unión Europea y su marco jurídico internacional. Por esta razón, se ha estudiado la jurisprudencia de la Corte Europea de Justicia, así como el papel desempeñado por los reguladores de la industria naviera que buscan evitar infracciones por parte de los buques con banderas de conveniencia. De igual forma, se describen las posibles medidas que serán tomadas por los Estados Europeos que conllevan a la permanencia de estos registros marítimos en vez de su desaparición a pesar de todas las controversias que los rodean, teniendo en cuenta la influencia de la globalización en la regulación del comercio internacional. Esta investigación utilizó los métodos deductivo, analítico y no experimental con la finalidad de obtener los resultados

    Visitas del artículo 1733 | Visitas PDF 2630

    Descargas

    Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
    1. Case C-221/89, Regina v. Secretary of State for
    2. Transport 1991 ECR I-3905; [1991] 2 Lloyd’s
    3. Rep 648
    4. Case 167/73 Commission v. France[1973]
    5. ECR 359.
    6. France v. Great BritainMuscat Dhows Permanent
    7. Court of Arbitration (1905) 11 RIAA 83.
    8. Case C-62/96 Commission v. HellenicRepublic
    9. ECR 1-6725, 133.
    10. Case C-47/02 Anker and others v Germany[2003]
    11. ECR-I 10447; [2004] 2 CMLR 845; [2003] All
    12. ER (D) 62 (Oct).
    13. Case C-299/02 Commission v. Netherlands
    14. 2 All ER (D) (206) (Oct).
    15. M/V Saiga (No.2) (Saint Vincent v. Guinea),
    16. Judgment ITLOS Case No.2, para 83 (July 1
    17. .
    18. Ligget Co. v. Lee288 U.S. 517 (1933).
    19. Cases C-72/91 and C-73/91 Firma Sloman
    20. NeptunSchiffahrts AG v. Seebetriebsrat Bodo
    21. Zisemer, de la SlomanNeptunSchiffahrts AG
    22. (1994) 31 CMLR 137.
    23. Viking Line Abp v. International Transport
    24. Workers Federation [2005] EWCA Civ 1299.
    25. Case comment
    26. (2006) “Sham voyage in ballast may not
    27. circumvent rules on island cabotage” 186 EU
    28. Focus 29-30.
    29. Legislation
    30. Geneva Convention on the High Seas in 1958.
    31. United Nations Convention on the Law of
    32. the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982.
    33. Convention of Registration of Ships 1986.
    34. UK Merchant Shipping Act 1988.
    35. Maltese Merchant Shipping Act 1973 (as
    36. amended)
    37. Cypriot Merchant Shipping Laws 1963-2004
    38. (Register of ships, Sales or mortgages); 1992-
    39. (Fees and Taxes) and 1963-2002 (Masters
    40. and Seamen).
    41. Books
    42. BREDIMA-SAVOPOULOU, A. (1990). The
    43. Common Shipping Policy of the EC Amsterdam
    44. Elsevier Publishers B.V. 72-75.
    45. LEONARD J. H. (1988). Pollution and the
    46. Struggle for World Product: Multinational
    47. Corporations, Environment, and International
    48. Comparative Advantage Cambridge, Cambridge
    49. University Press, 6.
    50. METAXAS, B. (1971). The Economics of Tramp
    51. Shipping London The Atholone Press
    52. University of London, 154-158.
    53. POWER, V. (1998). EC Shipping Law (2nded)
    54. London and Hong Kong, LLP,175-180.
    55. SZYSZCZAK, E. (2007). The Regulation of the
    56. State in Competitive Markets in the EU Portland
    57. Hart Publishing 180-184.
    58. Journal articles
    59. ADEMUN-ODEKE (2005). “An examination
    60. of Bareboat Charter Registries and Flag of
    61. Convenience Registries in International
    62. Law” 36 The journal of Ocean Development &
    63. International Law 339-362.
    64. ALDERTON T and WINCHESTER (2002).
    65. “Flag states and Safety: 1997-1999”. 29
    66. Maritime Policy & Management 151-162.
    67. ARGIROFFO, E. (2003). “Flags of convenience
    68. and Substandard vessels: A review of the
    69. ILO’s approach to the problem” International
    70. Labour Review 437-453.
    71. BOCZEK B. A. (1963). “Flags of convenience
    72. An International Legal Study” 57 The
    73. American Journal of International Law October
    74. -952.
    75. DAVIES A. (2006). “Therightostrikeversusfree
    76. domofestablishmentin E Claw: thebattle
    77. commences.” 35 The Industrial Law Journal
    78. -86.
    79. Einar R. (2007). “Elements of Nordic Practice
    80. : Norwegian Measures taken against
    81. Stateless Vessel Conducting Unauthorized
    82. Fishing on the High Seas” 76 Nordic Journal
    83. of International Law May 301-303.
    84. FRENDO M. (2000). “The future of open
    85. registries in the European Union” Lloyd’s
    86. Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly August
    87. -393.
    88. FORBES K. (2003). “Losing prestige?” 153
    89. New Law Journal January.
    90. GREAVES R. (2007). “European Union Law
    91. Current developments” 56 International and
    92. Comparative Law Quarterly April 415 ICQL 56
    93. (415).
    94. GREAVES R. (1993). “Transport” 42 The
    95. International and Comparative Law Quarterly
    96. January 180-185.
    97. HARRISON, J. (2000). “The Accountability
    98. of Classification Societies: The Role of
    99. Classification and Market-oriented and
    100. Policy Issues (The “Erika”)*” 7 The journal of
    101. International Maritime Law November/
    102. December 299-302.
    103. HUI W. (2004). “The EU Marine Oil Pollution
    104. Prevention Regime-Recent Developments”
    105. European Environmental Law Review November
    106. -303.
    107. KAN A. (2005). “Commission v. Netherlands
    108. Case C- 299/02” 99 The American Journal of
    109. International Law October 867-873.
    110. KESELJ T. (1999). “PortState Jurisdiction in
    111. Respect of Pollution from Ships: The 1982
    112. United Nations Convention on the Law of
    113. the Sea and the Memoranda of Understanding”
    114. Ocean Development & International
    115. Law 127-160.
    116. MENSAH T. (2006). “Seafarers in the
    117. modern maritime industry: the need for
    118. reform” 2 The Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial
    119. Law QuaterlyMay 172-180.
    120. MURPHY D. (2004). “The structure of
    121. regulatory competition: Corporations and
    122. Public Policies in a Global Economy” 29(5)
    123. European Law review 730-731.
    124. NOVITZ T. (2008). “Taking collective action”
    125. Competition Law Insight April CLI 74(10).
    126. NOVITZ T. (2006). “The right to strike and
    127. re-flagging in the European Union: free
    128. movement provisions and human rights.” 2
    129. The Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law
    130. QuaterlyMay 242-256.
    131. OSIEKE E. (1979). “Flags of Convenience:
    132. Recent Developments.” 73 The American
    133. Journal of International Law October 604-627.
    134. OZCAYIR Z. (2001). “The Role of Port State
    135. Control” 8 The journal of International Maritime
    136. Law November 147-159.
    137. OZCAYIR Z. (2000). “The “Erika” and its
    138. aftermath” 7 The journal of International
    139. Maritime Law September 230-240.
    140. OZCAYIR Z. (2000). “Flags of convenience:
    141. and the need for International Co-operation:
    142. A view from the Bosphorus.” 7 The Journal
    143. of International Maritime Law May 111-117.
    144. PAPAVIZAS C and KIERN (2007). “2005-
    145. : U.S. Maritime Legislative Developments”
    146. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce
    147. July 267.
    148. PULIDO J. (2005). “The EU Law on Classification
    149. Societies: Scope and Liability Issues”.
    150. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce October.
    151. SAMPSON H. and BLOOR (2007). “When
    152. Jacks gets out of the box: The Problems of
    153. Regulating a Global Industry” 41 Sociology
    154. -569.
    155. TOH R. and PHANG (1993). “Quasi-Flag of
    156. Convenience Shipping: The wave of the
    157. future” 33 Transportation Journal 31-39.
    158. VORBACH J. (2001). “The vital role of
    159. Non-flag States Actors in the Pursuit of
    160. Safer Shipping” 32 Ocean Development &
    161. International Law 27-42.
    162. Magazine articles
    163. “Keeping the country afloat” The Economist
    164. th August 2007.
    165. “It’s all black and white” Fair Play 2005, 355
    166. (6356).
    167. Websites
    168. Business Source Premier: www.search.
    169. ebscohost.com
    170. Eur-lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/
    171. European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/
    172. International Transport Workers’ Federation:
    173. www.itfglobal.org
    174. International Maritime Organization IMO:
    175. www.imo.org
    176. Lexis Nexis UK: www.lexisnexis.co.uk
    177. Malta Maritime Authority: www.mma.
    178. gov.mt
    179. United Nations Conference on Trade and
    180. Development UNCTAD: www.unctad.org
    181. Website articles
    182. DE SOMBRE, E. (2003). “Globalization and
    183. Environmental Protection on the High Seas”
    184. August Consultado: 21Junio 2008 from Central
    185. European University Disponible en:
    186. http://web.ceu.hu/polsci/Illicit_TradeCEU/Week5-DeSombre.doc
    187. FEBIN A. K. (2007). “Evolution of Flags of
    188. Convenience” December Consultado: 19Junio
    189. de 2008 Disponible en: Shipping Law
    190. Notes http://shippinglawtimes.blogspot.
    191. com/search?q=
    192. HEKIMOGLU L. (2001). “Globalization,
    193. Coastal States, and the Turkish Straits”
    194. November Consultado: 21 de Junio de 2008
    195. Disponible en: Istanbul Bilgi Universityhttp:/
    196. /denizhukuku.bilgi.edu.tr/doc/ibuconfe
    197. rencepaper_ lh%5B1%5D.doc
    198. LEISS W. (2003) “Smart regulation and risk
    199. management”. Consultado: Julio 27 de 2008
    200. Disponible en: WilliamLeisshttp://www.
    201. leiss.ca/images/stories/Articles/smart_
    202. regulation_and_risk_management.pdf
    203. MIDDLETON J. (2007). “Ship registration
    204. and the role of the flag” Consultado: Junio
    205. de 2008 Disponible en: Federal Court of
    206. Australia http://www. fedcourt.gov.au/how/
    207. admiralty_ papersand publications20.rtf
    208. MONTERO F. (2003). “Open registers: Past,
    209. Present and Future” Consultado: 19 de Junio
    210. de 2008 Disponible en: Science Direct
    211. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_
    212. ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VCD49DFGN62&_
    213. user=983321&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_
    214. sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000044920&_
    215. version=1&_ urlVersion=0&_userid=983321
    216. &md5=53e94 b7753fbe86c30e1367237adaa98
    217. NEFF R. (2007). “Flags that Hide the dirty
    218. truth” Consultado: 22de Noviembre 2007
    219. Disponible en: Global Policy Forum http://
    220. www.globalpolicy.org/nations/flags/2007/
    221. dirtyflags.htm
    222. OUDE A. (1999). “The Genuine Link Concept;
    223. Time for a Post Mortem?”Consultado: 10de Julio
    224. de 2008 Disponible en: Netherlands Institute
    225. for the Law of the Sea NILOS http://
    226. soliscms.uu.nl/content/genuine%20 link. pdf
    227. SAKASHITA M. (2003). “Memorandum on
    228. legal of flags of convenience (Bermuda
    229. Companies and Vessels) and oil tanker
    230. liability” Consultado: 18de Julio 2008. Disponible
    231. en: Ecojuris Institute of Environmental
    232. Law http://webcenter.ru/~ecojuris/
    233. EPROJECTS/memorandum_flags.htm
    234. SEWARD R. C. (2002). “The Role of Protection
    235. and Indemnity Clubs” Consultado: 11
    236. Noviembre de 2007. Disponible en: International
    237. Association of Independent Tanker
    238. Owners INTERTANKO http://www.
    239. intertanko.com/pubupload/protection
    240. %20%20 indemnity%20HK%202002.pdf
    Tutoriales

    Autores:

    ¿Cómo enviar un artículo?

    Par evaluador:

    ¿Cómo evaluar un artículo?

    Información

    Palabras clave

    Scimago

    SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    Indexaciones

    Publindex - Categoria B

    Catalogo Biblioteca Nacional de Colombia

    SCOPUS

    SCIELO

    Latindex

    Ebsco Host

    Actualidad Iberoamericana

    MIAR

    ROAD

    Fuente Academica

    Código QR

    Más leídos en los últimos 30 días

    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |