Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

BETWEEN MODERNITY AND TRADITION IN CLASSROOM: STORY OF A LEARNING EXPERIENCIA IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING

ENTRE LO MODERNO Y LO TRADICIONAL: RELATO DE UNA EXPERIENCIA DE APRENDIZAJE EN PROGRAMACIÓN DE COMPUTADORES




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
[1]
O. I. Trejos Buriticá, L. E. Muñoz Guerrero, and J. I. Ríos Patiño, “BETWEEN MODERNITY AND TRADITION IN CLASSROOM: STORY OF A LEARNING EXPERIENCIA IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING”, Rev. Ing. Mat. Cienc. Inf, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 39–45, Jul. 2023, Accessed: Oct. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/902

doi
Dimensions
PlumX
license

 

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional

Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
Omar Iván Trejos Buriticá

    Luis Eduardo Muñoz Guerrero

      Jorge Iván Ríos Patiño


        Omar Iván Trejos Buriticá,

        Ingeniero de Sistemas, Especialista en Instrumentación Física, MSc en Comunicación Educativa, PhD en Ciencias de la Educación. Docente de Planta Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Investigador Senior.


        Luis Eduardo Muñoz Guerrero,

        Ingeniero de Sistemas, MSc en Ingeniería de Sistemas, PhD en Ciencias de la Educación. Docente de Planta Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Investigador Junior.


        Jorge Iván Ríos Patiño,

        Ingeniero Industrial, MSc en Representación del Conocimiento, PhD © en Ingeniería. Docente de Planta, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Investigador Junior.


        The confrontation between the modern and the traditional is an important side in education research. This article presents the results of an investigation carried out in the classroom, where the effectiveness of learning is compared from the use of the cell phone camera compared to the traditional way of copying in the notebook, within a mutually exclusive methodology to make observations with objectivity. The results show that although technological advances facilitate some activities of the human being in a learning context that does not necessarily means it enables the learning of disciplinary knowledge. On the other hand, the traditional ways of consigning the knowledge imparted by the teacher in his keynote presentation, that is, copying by hand and letter, allow the student a direct contact with the knowledge mentioned and its impact on learning is more effective. It is concluded that in a context of technological learning, the engineer teacher must be clear when to use certain modern technological resources and when to open the spaces for the student to register, from his own perspective, the new knowledge acquired.

        DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2023.v10.n20.a139


        Article visits 84 | PDF visits 78


        Downloads

        Download data is not yet available.
        1. M. Eady y L. Lockyer, Tools for Learning: technology and teaching, Wollongong (Australia): University of Wollongong Press, 2013.
        2. R. Falcao, Improving learning outcomes assessment in Engineering Education, Lovaina (Bélgica): Universidad Nova de Lisboa - ENAEE Members Forum 2017, Nov 2017.
        3. D. P. Ausubel, Sicología Educativa: Un enfoque cognitivo, New York: McGraw Hill, 2010.
        4. J. Medina, Los 12 principios del cerebro, Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma, 2010.
        5. D. P. Ausubel, The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge, Washington - USA: Springer, 2012.
        6. O. I. Trejos Buriticá, Significado y Competencias, Pereira (Risaralda) - Colombia: Editorial Papiro, 2012, p. 127.
        7. J. De Zubiría, «Los modelos pedagógicos,» de Encuentro Nacional de Pedagogía, Popayán (Cauca), mayo 2007.
        8. F. Diaz Barriga y G. Hernandez Rojas, Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo, México: McGraw Hill, 2002.
        9. J. Wing, «Computational Thinking,» Communications on the ACM, vol. 49, nº 3, pp. 33-35, Marzo
        10. G. Siemmens, «Knowing Knowledge,» Lulu.com Editorial, Madrid (España), 2016.
        11. A. Ballester Valori, Meaningful Learning in practice, Islas Canarias: Universitat de les Illes Ballears, 2011.
        12. T. J. Baker, Connectivism & Connected Knowledge, NewYork (USA): Amazon Digital Services, 2013.
        13. R. Bisquerra Alcina, Metodología de la investigación educativa, Madrid (España): Editorial La Muralla S. A., 2004.
        14. C. Cobo y J. Moravec, Aprendizaje Invisible: Hacia una ecología de la educación, Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, 2011.
        15. S. Merriam, Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation, New York: John Willey & Sons Press, 2015.
        16. R. Day, How to write an publish scientific works, Washington: The Oryx Press, 2005.
        17. J. e. a. Barbara, «How to write a scientific article,» International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 7, nº 5, pp. 512 - 517, 2012.
        Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |