A review of opinion mining and NLP challenges

UNA REVISIÓN A LA MINERIA DE OPINIONES Y LOS RETOS DEL PNL

In recent years, there has been a growth in the analysis of social networks to get an idea of what people think about current topics of interest, however, text mining systems originally designed for more regular types of texts Like news articles, they may need to be adapted to deal with social media posts like Facebook, tweets, etc. In this article, a reflection is presented on issues related to mining opinion from social networks and the challenges they impose on a natural language processing system (NLP).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a80

1. E. Boiy, Pieter Hens, Koen Deschacht, and Marie-Francine Moens. Automatic sentiment analysis of onlinetext. InProc. of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Vienna, Austria. 2007.
2. A. Aue and M. Gamon. Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains: a case study. InProc. of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovetz, Bulgaria. 2015.
3. J. Blitzer, M. Dredze, and F. Pereira. Biographies, bollywood, boomboxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In Annual Meeting-Association For Computational Linguistics, page 440. 2007.
4. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis.Information Retrieval, 2(1). 2008.
5. A. Popescu and O. Etzioni. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. InProc. of the Conference on Empirical Methods for Natural Language Pro-cessing (EMNLP), pages 339–346, Vancouver, Canada. 2005.
6. A. Scharl and A. Weichselbraun. An automated ap-proach to investigating the online media coverage of USpresidential elections.Journal of Information Technol-ogy and Politics, 5(1):121–132. 2008.
7. M. Taboada, J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. Lexicon based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 1(September 2010):1–41. 2011.
8. A. Pak and P. Paroubek. Twitter as a corpus forsentiment analysis and opinion mining. Proceedings of LREC. 2010.
9. A. C. Mullaly, C.L. Gagné, T.L. Spalding, and K.A.Marchak. Examining ambiguous adjectives inadjective noun phrases: Evidence for representation as ashared core meaning. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1):87–114. 2010.
10. A. Weichselbraun, S. Gindl, and A. Scharl. Acontext-dependent supervised learning approach to sen-timent detection in large textual databases. Journal of Information and Data Management, 1(3):329–342. 2010.
11. S. Gindl, A. Weichselbraun, and A. Scharl. Crossdomain contextualisation of sentiment lexicons. InProceedings of 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2010), pages 771–776. 2010.
12. Johan Bollen and Huina Mao. Twitter mood as astock market predictor. IEEE Computer, 44(10):91–94. 2011.
13. H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, and V. Tablan. JAPE:a Java Annotation Patterns Engine (Second
14. Edition). Re-search Memorandum CS–00–10, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, November. 2000.