Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Law and politics in posmodernity: internationalist liberalism

DERECHO Y POLÍTICA EN LA POSMODERNIDAD: EL LIBERALISMO INTERNACIONALISTA



Open | Download


Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Jiménez, W. G., Meneses Quintana, O., & Ramírez Arenas, O. A. (2023). Law and politics in posmodernity: internationalist liberalism. The Republican Journal, 34, 129-148. https://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/917

doi
Dimensions
PlumX
license
 
William Guillermo Jiménez
    Orlando Meneses Quintana
      Oduber Alexis Ramírez Arenas

        William Guillermo Jiménez,

        Posdoctor en Derecho (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), doctor en Ciencias Políticas (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela), abogado y administrador público, especialista en Derecho Administrativo y especialista en Desarrollo Regional. Profesor titular de la Escuela Superior de Administración Pública (ESAP) y de la Universidad Libre, Bogotá, Colombia. Miembro de la Asociación Mundial de Justicia Constitucional.


        Orlando Meneses Quintana,

        Sociólogo, magíster en Ética y Política, candidato a doctor en Filosofía. Profesor asociado en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Libre, Bogotá.


        Oduber Alexis Ramírez Arenas,

        Doctor en Derecho, Profesor Titular Universidad Libre (Bogotá), Grupo de Investigación Estado, Derecho y Territorio.


        The most popular stream in international relations studies is associated with political realism as such emphasizes competition between States always seeking an advantageous position, whose description shows that such a rivalry can be ruthless. However, internationalist Liberalism explores alternatively the association tactics that help States to position themselves strategically on the international stage by seeking allies with those who share common interests. The promotion of cooperation agencies enables the study of the growing influence of actors other than national States, and recognizes the relative independence of the international environment with its own and distinct logic, although associated with the traditional logic of national interest and security. The paper aim is to explore the positions that John Rawls, Norberto Bobbio and Luigi Ferrajoli put forward. The method is qualitative, using documentary analysis techniques on secondary sources. It is concluded that the agreements and institutions arising from international liberalism restrict the action of States, seeking limitation to armed conflicts, the protection of human rights and the conditions for a more distributive global justice.

        DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2023.v34.a141


        Article visits 155 | PDF visits 134


        Downloads

        Download data is not yet available.
        Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |