Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Extractivismo, law and social conflict in Colombia

EXTRACTIVISMO, DERECHO Y CONFLICTO SOCIAL EN COLOMBIA



Open | Download


Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Bocanegra Acosta, H., & Carvajal Martínez, J. E. (2019). Extractivismo, law and social conflict in Colombia. The Republican Journal, 26, 143-169. https://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/519

doi
Dimensions
PlumX
license
 
Henry Bocanegra Acosta

    Jorge Enrique Carvajal Martínez

      Henry Bocanegra Acosta,

      Doctor en Sociología Jurídica e Instituciones Políticas, de la Universidad Externado de Colombia. Especialista y magíster en Administración Pública, Escuela Superior de Ad- ministración Pública (ESAP). Magíster en Educación de la Universidad Antonio Nariño. Abogado de la Universidad Libre. Licenciado en Ciencias de la Educación –especialidad sociales–. Docente investigador de la Universidad Libre, Grupo de Investigaciones Socio Jurídicas (GISJ); docente de la Corporación Universitaria Republicana.


      Jorge Enrique Carvajal Martínez,

      Doctor en Sociología Jurídica e Instituciones Políticas, tesis con mención de reconocimiento, Universidad Externado de Colombia. Magíster en Estudios Políticos del Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales IEPRI de la Universidad Nacional. Especialista en sociología jurídica, Universidad Externado de Colombia. Abogado, Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Licenciado en Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Profesor Asociado de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Investigador sénior


      This research article is the result of research on the project entitled, Public Policy, Law and Social Movements. The objective of this research is to present how popular consultations have been developed in Colombia regarding extraction processes. This is to demonstrate how this participation mechanism has become a tool for environmental advocacy and the fight of communities against the extractive model. The research question is how popular consultations are being used by Colombian society so as to question the extractive model? There search method tackles a socio-legal field as it confronts a social fact against a normative element of citizen participation, its approach is qualitative and the research tools stem from the documentary analysis. The article concludes that popular consultations in the context of the mining energy conflict have been important insofar as the communities affected by the extractivist model might exercise their right to decide whether or not to implement the energy mining model. The above-mentioned tools were innovative and effective; however, Colombian high courts have curtailed the effectiveness of these constitutional actions.

      DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2019.v26.a63


      Article visits 1833 | PDF visits 1665


      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.
      Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |