NUEVAS PERSPECTIVAS DE LA GOBERNANZA PRIVADA: UN ANÁLISIS DESDE LAS PRÁCTICAS DE RESPONSABILIDAD SOCIAL Y AMBIENTAL DE LAS EMPRESAS EN COLOMBIA

NUEVAS PERSPECTIVAS DE LA GOBERNANZA PRIVADA: UN ANÁLISIS DESDE LAS PRÁCTICAS DE RESPONSABILIDAD SOCIAL Y AMBIENTAL DE LAS EMPRESAS EN COLOMBIA

Las apuestas en materia de responsabilidad social y ambiental en Colombia
han generado una nueva perspectiva para gobernanza privada en materia de

sostenibilidad. Para comprender este fenómeno se analizan las memorias de
sostenibilidad, los estados financieros e informes de gestión, de un caso exitoso
de sostenibilidad en Colombia, con la pretensión de logra valorar si dichas
políticas constituyen un potencial instrumento político para avanzar en una
regulación estatal en dicha materia, o si bien se limitan solamente a una estrategia de gestión con repercusiones en la imagen corporativa y en el desempeño financiero de las empresas reportantes. Tras inferir las hipótesis de la investigación se concluye que la realización de reportes de sostenibilidad en Colombia, es una práctica reciente, muy a pesar de existir un marco normativo erigido por la constitución de 1991 en materia ambiental y de responsabilidad social empresarial, lo que conlleva a firmar que su significancia actual obedece a apuestas de innovación social y a una nueva forma de gobernanza privada,
como respuestas a las dinámicas económicas y las apuestas políticas del país.

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2016.v21.a18

1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968.
2. Archer C. & Fritsch S. (2010). Global fair trade: Humanizing globalization andreintroducing the normative to international political economy. Review of
3. International Political Economy, 17: 103–128.
4. Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge.
5. Bieri, F., & Boli, J. (2011, September). Trading diamonds responsibly: institutional explanations for corporate social responsibility. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 501-526). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
6. Birchall, S. J. (2014). Carbon management in New Zealand local government: co-benefits of action and organisational resolve in the absence of government support. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(3):253-267.
7. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2):281-299.
8. Boxenbaum, E., & Gond, J.-P. (2006). Cross-national transfer of business practices: Microstrategies of contextualization. DRUID Summer Conference 2006: Copenhagen Business School. University of Nottingham Business School.
9. Boxenbaum, E., & Gond, J.-P. (2006). Cross-national transfer of business practices: Microstrategies of contextualization. DRUID Summer Conference 2006: Copenhagen Business School. University of Nottingham Business School.
10. Boxenbaum, E., & Gond, J.-P. (2006). Cross-national transfer of business practices: Microstrategies of contextualization. DRUID Summer Conference 2006: Copenhagen Business School. University of Nottingham Business School.
11. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2002). Globalization and the environment: Strategies for international voluntary environmental initiatives. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(3):121-135.
12. Clift, R., Sim, S., & Sinclair, P. (2013). Sustainable Consumption and Production: quality, luxury and supply chain equity. In Treatise on Sustainability Science and Engineering (pp. 291-309). Springer Netherlands.
13. Daily, C. J., & Dollinger, M. (1992). An Empirical Examination of Ownership Structure in Family and Professionally Managed Firms. Family Business Review, June 1992;5 (2):117-136.
14. Daly, H.E. (1997). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Despeisse, M, Mbaye, F, Ball, PD, & Levers, A. (2012). The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations, 23(5):354–376.
16. Donaghey, J., Reinecke, J., Niforou, C., & Lawson, B. (2014). From employment relations to consumption relations: Balancing labor governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management, 53(2):229-252.
17. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 65-91. Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887
18. Donaldson, Thomas. (1999). Response: Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24:237-241.
19. Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., & Wood, S. (2014). Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework fo analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8(1):1-21.
20. Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112:2833-2850.
21. Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1):163-192.
22. Gunasekaran, A, & Spalanzani, A. (2011). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigation for research and applications. International Journal Production Economics, 140(1):35–47.
23. Jayal, AD, Badurdeen, F, Dillon, OW, Jr, & Jawahir, IS. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: modelling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3): 144–152.
24. Joutsenvirta, M. & Vaara, M. (2015). Legitimacy Struggles and Political Corporate Social Responsibility in International Settings: A Comparative Discursive Analysis of a Contested Investment in Latin America. Organization Studies June 2015;36( 6):741-777.
25. Kenne, A., Lindqvist, B., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2013). Kontrollorganiseringens mångfald: En kartläggning av hållbarhetsmärkningars kontrollorganisering internationellt och nationellt i Sverige.
26. Kenne, A., Lindqvist, B., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2013). Kontrollorganiseringens mångfald: En kartläggning av hållbarhetsmärkningars kontrollorganisering internationellt och nationellti Sverige.
27. King, B., & McDonnell, M. H. (2012). Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting.Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks. Edited by Kiyoteru Tsutsui and Alwyn Lim.(Forthcoming).
28. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11):3436- 3448.
29. Larrinaga, O. V., & Rodríguez, J. L. (2010). El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en dirección y economía de la empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(3):31-52.
30. McKeown, B. F., & Thomas, D. B., (2013). Q Methodology: 66 (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Editorial SAGE Publications, Inc. Second Edition.
31. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (Vol. 66). Sage Publications.
32. Medina Domínguez, C. (2012). La empresa y la inversión en formación: El ROI. Madrid: Universitas.
33. Mena, S., & Waeger, D. (2014). Activism for corporate responsibility: Conceptualizing private regulation opportunity structures. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7):1091- 1117.
34. Muller, A. R., Pfarrer, M. D., & Little, L. M. (2013) A Theory of Collective Empathy in Corporate Philanthropy Decisions. ACAD MANAGE REV January 2014 39:1-21; published ahead of print March 6, 2013, doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0031
35. Mzembe, A. N., Downs, Y., & Meaton, J. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in Malawi: Antecedents, issues, practices and future directions. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 3-29). Springer International Publishing.
36. Mzembe, A. N., Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., and Vanhamme, J. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt. (2015) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/csr.1370
37. Naciones Unidas (ONU). Indicadores de los Objetivos de desarrollo del Milenio (ODM).
38. Nueva York, 2006. Disponible en:http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Home.aspx
39. Naciones Unidas (ONU). Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio Nueva York, Informe de 2015. en: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/
40. Progress2015/Spanish2015.pdf
41. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
42. Prado, A. M. (2013). Competition among self-regulatory institutions: Sustainability certifications in the cut-flower industry. Business & Society, 0007650313493990.
43. Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case?: exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge university press.
44. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5-6):791-814.
45. Riisgaard, L. (2009). Global value chains, labor organization and private social standards: Lessons from East African cut flower industries. World Development, 37(2):326-340.
46. Riisgaard, L. (2011). Towards more stringent sustainability standards? Trends in the cut flower industry. Review of African Political Economy, 38(129):435-453.
47. Riisgaard, L., & Gibbon, P. (2014). Labour Management on Contemporary Kenyan Cut Flower Farms: Foundations of an Industrial–Civic Compromise.Journal of Agrarian Change, 14(2):260-285.
48. Riisgaard, L., & Hammer, N. (2011). Prospects for labour in global value chains: Labour standards in the cut flower and banana industries. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(1):168-190.
49. Shamir, R. (2011). Socially Responsible Private Regulation: World?Culture or World?Capitalism?. Law & Society Review, 45(2):313-336.
50. Sikor, T., Auld, G., Bebbington, A. J., Benjaminsen, T. A., Gentry, B. S., Hunsberger, C., ... & Upton, C. (2013). Global land governance: from territory to flow?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5):522-527.
51. Singh, P. (2013). No Roses without Thorns: Global Consumers of Cut Flowers as Political Actors. Ky. J. Equine Agric. & Nat. Resources L., 6, 23.
52. Slager, R., Gond, J. P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33(5-6):763-790.
53. Stake, Robert E (2013). Investigación con estudio de casos. Cuarta edición. Ediciones Morata, S. L. Madrid, España.
54. Steinbauer, R., R. Renn, R. Taylor, and P. Njoroge. 2014. “Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-Leadership,” J Bus Ethics 120(3): 381–392, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 013-1662-x
55. Sunder, S. (2007). Teoría de la Contabilidad y el control. Bogotá; D. C.: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Traducción y revisión técnica por: Nohora García; Claudia Niño; Diego Hernández: Manuel Muñoz y Pedro Nel Páez.
56. Tiana, A. (2013). La IEA y la evaluación internacional de los resultados de la educación: medio siglo de trabajos e investigaciones. En J. Vergara, E. Gavari y M.J. García (Coords.). Conversaciones con un maestro: homenaje a García Garrido, J.L. Madrid: Ediciones Académicas. págs. 741-752.
57. Timmermans, Stefan, & Steven Epstein (2010) ‘‘A World Full of Standards but Not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standardization,’’ 36 Annual Rev. of Sociology, págs. 69–89.
58. VanSandt, C. and C. Neck. 2003. “Bridging Ethics and Self Leadership: Overcoming Ethical Discrepancies Between Employee and Organizational Standards,” J Bus Ethics 43(4): 363–387, http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023009728390
59. Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3):302-323.
60. Yilmaz, A. K., & Flouris, T. (2010). Managing corporate sustainability: Risk management process based perspective. Afr. J. Bus. Manage, 4(2):162-171.